Papers with human evaluation framework
Finding Replicable Human Evaluations via Stable Ranking Probability (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that human evaluation is the best way to rank natural language generation systems . human raters can exhibit different behaviors when rating outputs, causing ranking to be unstable . stability is the degree to which a specific evaluation methodology produces the same system ranking when repeated. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate results through the lens of stability: stability is the degree to which a specific evaluation methodology produces the same system ranking when repeated. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a dataset of multi-segment translations rated by multiple professionals . human raters can exhibit different behaviors when rating NLG outputs, the study shows . |
WikiHowQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Document Non-Factoid Question Answering (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Answering non-factoid questions (NFQs) is a challenging task, requiring passage-level answers that are difficult to construct and evaluate. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-document NFQA benchmark built on WikiHow, a website dedicated to answering “how-to” questions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework includes 11,746 human-written answers along with 74,527 supporting documents. |
LENS: A Learnable Evaluation Metric for Text Simplification (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing metrics for text simplification are based on unitary or outdated models, making them unsuitable for this approach. |
| Approach: | They present a learnable evaluation metric for text simplification using language models . they also introduce a human evaluation framework that rates simplifications from several models a list-wise manner . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model correlates much better with human judgment than existing metrics. |
FFAEval: Evaluating Dialogue System via Free-For-All Ranking (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for open-domain dialogue systems show poor correlation with human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a free-for-all human evaluation framework that shares dialogue history with annotators for multi-turn scoring. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves a strong correlation with human assessment on English and Chinese dialogue systems. |